The charge was the Threat with a Deadly Weapon and had nothing to do with the dispute. The good doctor admitted to carrying a gun during another situation. The decision of the lower court was probably upheld.
The dispute about payment for services was a separate issue.
I would not refuse to hear this case if it came before me, and based on the testimony of the individuals, I believe the judges made the correct ruling.
Unlock with Patreon
Interesting to see the photo of the post office when no trees were there.
The charge was the Threat with a Deadly Weapon and had nothing to do with the dispute. The good doctor admitted to carrying a gun during another situation. The decision of the lower court was probably upheld.
The dispute about payment for services was a separate issue.
What was the outcome of the appeal?
I would not refuse to hear this case if it came before me, and based on the testimony of the individuals, I believe the judges made the correct ruling.
He said – he said. But Sego documented his case to authorities – twice. Ruling was correct.