1. Interesting to see the photo of the post office when no trees were there.

  2. The charge was the Threat with a Deadly Weapon and had nothing to do with the dispute. The good doctor admitted to carrying a gun during another situation. The decision of the lower court was probably upheld.

    The dispute about payment for services was a separate issue.

  3. What was the outcome of the appeal?

  4. I would not refuse to hear this case if it came before me, and based on the testimony of the individuals, I believe the judges made the correct ruling.

  5. He said – he said. But Sego documented his case to authorities – twice. Ruling was correct.

Leave a Reply